-What is writing? In what ways have my perceptions on what writing is evolved this semester?
-To what extent have I achieved the course learning objectives and thoughts about goals I have not achieved yet.
I thought that writing should not involve much time. I would skim through information and quickly read through the criteria for an assignment, not do much note-taking or brainstorming, find a few sources to quote from and paraphrase to unify some ideas and be done. That was my understanding at the beginning of this semester. After completing different types of writing assignments, and trying to achieve the course learning outcomes, my perception on what writing is has changed. I noticed that writing includes a complicated thought process. It is necessary to be mindful of every sentence and word in the instructions, sources I’m reviewing, and my drafts. I have realized that from my first post on blackboard to this last assignment, and in all drafts in between. In the first homework post on blackboard, I had to describe myself. I threw in a few sentences and was done. But my instructor came back with follow up questions that made me note that I could have made my description clearer, so I revised it, and thought I did a great job the second time around (I include my first post and its revised version in the portfolio). However, my grade wasn’t 100 so I followed up with my instructor and she said it’s because I did not peer review other students’ posts. That’s when I realized that I didn’t really read the homework instructions. I went back to blackboard and peer reviewed a few of my classmates’ posts.
The second assignment involved writing a poem about where I’m from. I was surprised I didn’t get any comments from peers so I thought maybe my poem wasn’t clear enough for them. I went back and revised it (I include the revised version of the poem in the portfolio). Then came four writing assignments that showed me even more how complicated writing is. Before I describe them in detail, I want to note that even this self-assessment essay again proved me wrong as to what I thought writing was about. I’m including in my portfolio my first draft of this essay to show that I didn’t fully address the instructions on the first attempt. When I went back to the instructions, I saw I would be evaluated not on whether I achieved a course learning goal but instead on how well I demonstrated my understanding of those goals. I finally grasped that the instructions said that including my final versions of assignments was just the “minimum.” To really do this essay right, I also had to provide drafts of essays, examples of homework, annotated notes on sources to show critical reading, etc. All of this I have missed before I submitted my first draft of this essay. I hope that this second draft proves that I realize how much more goes into writing. I will go now to describe my work on the papers I submitted.
In my personal artifact essay, the first essay, I described my jiu jitsu belt as a personal artifact representing the jiu jitsu subculture. In my reflection, I mentioned that I needed to think much more about how to connect sentences, and convey what I meant in detail. This was a course goal, to “enhance strategies for…drafting, revising, editing and self assessment.” (goal 2) Maintaining “rhetorical sensibility” (goal 1), meaning a clear connection to each idea so that an audience would understand what I’m writing, was another goal I wanted to improve on.
In the classmate interview essay, Essay 2, I intended for anyone who reads it, even people who don’t know anything about the gaming industry, to understand the gaming subculture better by interviewing a classmate who has been playing different video games for years. In the process of doing this assignment, I improved on two other course learning objectives because I was engaging “in the collaborative and social aspects of the writing processes” by interviewing my classmate (goal 4). I also strengthened my practices of “quoting, paraphrasing, summarizing, synthesizing, analyzing, and citing sources” (goal 8) because I had to write what my classmate told me by converting conversations into an essay, so this process helped me develop these two goals. I include in my portfolio my annotations on the chapter from the Fieldworking book that dealt with interview techniques I used for interviewing my classmate.
By essay 3, the subculture research essay, I felt I made a considerable improvement in several course goals. In that assignment, I went over how hip hop led to 90s rap, and then I reviewed what rappers at that time rapped about. Although my instructor gave me a high grade, she gave me many comments. The ones I will cite here were the ones I will forever remember in my future academic writing. She highlighted that “a rule of thumb about punctuation and parenthetical citation: You do not need to use the period twice. If the direct quote ends exactly where you have ended it, the period goes inside the quotation mark. If you end the quote mid-sentence, the period would go after the parenthetical citation.” She also noted a few times that before I quote, I must use “signal phrases.” She explained that I have to tell my readers why I have chosen to use a specific quote and reiterate what a quote meant (I include those comments in my portfolio). In essay 4, I thought about these comments and attempted to use punctuation and signal phrases the way my instructor explained.
In the fieldworking textbook, I learned of a data culminating technique called intersubjectivity, and with the use of footnotes, I triangulated my sources to discuss my findings. Thinking how to connect ideas in a clear way in this essay further enhanced my drafting, revising, and editing strategies (goal 2). I reviewed many online sources about this community for this essay, and that helped me improve on achieving goal 7, which is about practicing using the internet and other databases. I can say I also achieved goal 5, which was about analyzing a genre (“engage in genre analysis… to explore effective writing .”) I ended up quoting too many sources and attempted to avoid that and use more of my voice and essay 4.
In essay 4, the mini-ethnography, I expanded on insider viewpoints of famous 90s gangsta rappers to explain where their hardcore rap styles came from and how their background infused their rapper persona. In this essay I went directly to hear from the rap artists themselves. Although I couldn’t interview them, because they were either inaccessible to me, or dead, I reviewed their rap lyrics, which were their way to tell their life stories. I watched interviews and documentaries with them talking about what led to them rapping in this style. I had to look online to find these interviews and documentaries and also look for scholarly articles, and that made me improve on goal 7 (“using library resources, online databases, and the internet to locate sources appropriate to your writing project”). In my portfolio, I also include some of my notes collecting information from interviews and articles.
This essay made me improve on other course goals. Writing about very explicit and slang-driven Gangsta rap lyrics made me “acknowledge” how these rappers and I had “linguistic differences” (course goal no. 1). One who listens to this gangsta music can think that the rappers intended to promote violence but listening to the rappers talk about their raps made me conclude that their intentions were to rap about their lives as they were. Since I was able to conclude that, I can say I achieved learning outcome 6, “formulate and articulate a stance.” I also include in my portfolio one of the academic sources I cited in essay 4 and my annotations on it to demonstrate critical reading. I cited from a book I found among a collection of free books to take home in the NAC building. The book caught my attention even before I thought to incorporate it as a scholarly source because of its title, Music and Culture. Little did I know, it was right on point with what the rap artists said: they didn’t mean to promote violence. In a virtual meeting with my instructor before the final draft was due, she emphasized I needed to input my own voice as a writer. This influenced my writing of the final draft, and made it very different from the first and second ones.
In all four essays, I attempted to explain information to people who knew nothing about a subject, and this helped me achieve goal 3, “negotiate your …writing goals and audience expectations.”
My perception of writing has changed during the course. My ability to self-assess my writing and how much goes into it improved. I recognize now that writing is a complicated process that requires more effort than I initially thought (and much more effort than I put into this course the last semester). While I developed as a writer, I see I need to keep improving in all course goals. Although I think I reached them in the papers I wrote, I have a lot more to learn. I also want to better my time management. I underestimated how long each assignment would take and as a result either submitted papers at the last minute or needed an extension and didn’t leave enough time for proofreading. Finding out how to write is complicated and requires a higher level of diligence than I used to put in. Yet, I hope I’m on the right track of evolving as a writer.